Please help spread the word that the deadline for the Working Group for amendments to the International Health Regulations (WGIHR) to submit a final package of targeted amendments to the WHO is fast approaching - January 27, 2024.
If (and when) the WGIHR fails to meet this deadline it means that NO AMENDMENTS MAY BE CONSIDERED BY the 77th World Health Assembly which is scheduled to begin on May 27, 2024.
477 Health Minister may determine emergency requirements during human biosecurity emergency period
(1) During a human biosecurity emergency period, the Health Minister may determine any requirement that he or she is satisfied is necessary:
(a) to prevent or control:
(i) the entry of the declaration listed human disease into Australian territory or a part of Australian territory; or
(ii) the emergence, establishment or spread of the declaration listed human disease in Australian territory or a part of Australian territory; or
(b) to prevent or control the spread of the declaration listed human disease to another country; or
(c) if a recommendation has been made to the Health Minister by the World Health Organization under Part III of the International Health Regulations in relation to the declaration listed human disease—to give effect to the recommendation.
Note 1: A person who fails to comply with a requirement determined under this subsection may commit an offence (see section 479).
Note 2: For variation and revocation, see subsections 33(3) and (3AA) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
(2) A determination made under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument, but section 42 (disallowance) of the Legislation Act 2003 does not apply to the determination.
(3) Without limiting subsection (1), the requirements that the Health Minister may determine include the following:
(a) requirements that apply to persons, goods or conveyances when entering or leaving specified places;
(b) requirements that restrict or prevent the movement of persons, goods or conveyances in or between specified places;
(c) requirements for specified places to be evacuated;
(d) if a recommendation has been made as referred to in paragraph (1)(c)—requirements for the purposes of giving effect to the recommendation.
4) Before determining a requirement under subsection (1), the Health Minister must be satisfied of all of the following:
(a) that the requirement is likely to be effective in, or to contribute to, achieving the purpose for which it is to be determined;
(b) that the requirement is appropriate and adapted to achieve the purpose for which it is to be determined;
(c) that the requirement is no more restrictive or intrusive than is required in the circumstances;
(d) that the manner in which the requirement is to be applied is no more restrictive or intrusive than is required in the circumstances;
(e) that the period during which the requirement is to apply is only as long as is necessary.
(5) A requirement determined under subsection (1) applies despite any provision of any other Australian law.
(6) A determination made under subsection (1) must not require an individual to be subject to a biosecurity measure of a kind set out in Subdivision B of Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 2.
Note: Subdivision B of Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 2 sets out the biosecurity measures that may be included in a human biosecurity control order.
When determination ceases to have effect
(7) A determination made under subsection (1) ceases to have effect at the end of the human biosecurity emergency period, unless it is revoked earlier.
478 Health Minister may give directions during human biosecurity emergency period
(1) During a human biosecurity emergency period, the Health Minister may give any direction, to any person, that the Health Minister is satisfied is necessary:
(a) to prevent or control:
(i) the entry of the declaration listed human disease into Australian territory or a part of Australian territory; or
(ii) the emergence, establishment or spread of the declaration listed human disease in Australian territory or a part of Australian territory; or
(b) to prevent or control the spread of the declaration listed human disease to another country; or
(c) if a recommendation has been made to the Health Minister by the World Health Organization under Part III of the International Health Regulations in relation to the declaration listed human disease—to give effect to the recommendation.
Note 1: A person who fails to comply with a direction given under this subsection may commit an offence (see section 479).
Note 2: See also section 572 (general provisions relating to directions).
(2) Without limiting subsection (1), the directions that the Health Minister may give under that subsection include the following:
(a) a direction to a person who is in a position to close premises, or prevent access to premises, to do so;
(b) a direction for the purposes of giving effect to or enforcing a requirement determined under section 477;
(c) if a recommendation has been made as referred to in paragraph (1)(c)—a direction for the purposes of giving effect to the recommendation.
(3) Before giving a direction under subsection (1), the Health Minister must be satisfied of all of the following:
(a) that the direction is likely to be effective in, or to contribute to, achieving the purpose for which it is to be given;
(b) that the direction is appropriate and adapted to achieve the purpose for which it is to be given;
(c) that the direction is no more restrictive or intrusive than is required in the circumstances;
(d) if the direction is to apply during a period—that the period is only as long as is necessary.
(4) A direction may be given under subsection (1) despite any provision of any other Australian law.
(5) A direction must not be given under subsection (1) to an officer or employee of a State, Territory or State or Territory body unless the direction is in accordance with an agreement between the Commonwealth and the State, Territory or body.
(6) A direction given under subsection (1) must not require an individual to be subject to a biosecurity measure of a kind set out in Subdivision B of Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 2.
Note: Subdivision B of Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 2 sets out the biosecurity measures that may be included in a human biosecurity control order.
When direction ceases to have effect
(7) A direction given under subsection (1) ceases to have effect at the end of the human biosecurity emergency period, unless it is revoked earlier.
479 Person must comply with emergency requirements and directions
(1) A person must comply with a requirement determined under subsection 477(1) that applies to the person.
(2) A person must comply with a direction given under subsection 478(1) that applies to the person.
Fault‑based offences
(3) A person commits an offence if:
(a) a requirement determined under subsection 477(1) applies to the person; and
(b) the person engages in conduct; and
(c) the conduct contravenes the requirement.
Penalty: Imprisonment for 5 years or 300 penalty units, or both.
(4) A person commits an offence if:
(a) a direction given under subsection 478(1) applies to the person; and
(b) the person engages in conduct; and
(c) the conduct contravenes the direction.
Penalty for contravention of this subsection:
Imprisonment for 5 years or 300 penalty units, or both.
Godless unethical sheeple can't have "ethical" government or medicine, it then becomes ALL about Money & Power, with an, "It’s for the good of the people" sham thrown in for good measure!
It seems that we here in the United States 🇺🇸 have also been dealing with the “globalist regime” in our House of Representatives and Senate and through several decades of Presidents.
Although the truth has only just begun to emerge, the so called “Conspiracy Theorists” have been proven correct regarding the United Nations New World Order and their agenda.
It is the duty of each citizen of a country to make their voice heard. Freedom has never been free.
We (The War Room Posse) have been actively engaged with calling and emailing our members of Congress and the Senate for years now and we have made a difference. Our goal is to put our country first!!
I join hands with you and encourage ALL Australian’s to MAKE AUSTRALIA GREAT AGAIN !!
As we join hands to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!! Happy New Year and Much love
Thank-you Libby for this accurate update. Australians this is the line in the sand. If you don't want this Gates funded, led by a member of a terrorist organisation/accused of genocide despot in charge, time to let all of our Politicians know. About time the Liberals realised they need to be on the right side of history and this debate if they want another chance to run the country.
I wrote to my Federal MP (Indi, Victoria) as well as all the Victorian Federal coalition Senators regarding this. I believe this is the greatest threat to the greatest number of people in recorded history. We must all urge our politicians to legislate in order to have Australia exit the WHO membership and cut all ties with it before 2025. If this Treaty goes ahead it will be many times worse than the COVID era since there will be far more tools in the tyrannical arsenal than there were three years ago. There will be a Misinformation Act and a Digital ID bill to function in tandem with the Treaty. So the Government will have the power to completely silence your dissent and potentially freeze your bank account should you not consent to medical experiments. Considering the unfathomable step the Government took from 2019 to 2021 (from a world of individual freedoms in 2019 devolving into coercion, forced injections, forced masking, rubber bullets and arrests in 2021), do you really think literally forcing citizens to turn to crime to feed themselves to avoid being a lab rat is a bigger step than that was? It is a much smaller step given that last time you lost your job if you did not submit, so I do not believe I am being paranoid in stating that the Government will potentially cut you off completely from society and incarcerate you in isolation if you do not submit to Tedros's and Bill's will. And even then, they'll experiment on you anyway, just like the Nazis did.
Thank you Libby for the research you put into this. You have given us several avenues, including working at state govt level. Have no fear of labels fellow Aussies. Speak truth to power. A label is just name calling, we are adults and those who call us names are children. Speak now and act now or you will not have the chance to change anything in the future. They want us dead or slaves.
Andrew Stephenson is lying the u.k government will sign up to this nonsense without a doubt remember the so called king Charles is head of the wef and was the first evil entity to announce the great reset and the brexit vote was not upheld and a fake leaving agreement was signed which keeps the u.k in it so all smoke and mirrors and bullshit was the outcome
Sorry. Australia has never been sovereign, as it's financial Charter is tended by the British Crown. I can't believe Australian citizens continue to speculate otherwise. The World Health Organization is a corporate financed mafia, period. All members need to be executed.
The plandemic we had was a training session, seeing them lock up healthy people in quarantine stations was enough to scare me. Those who were locked up did not even get healthy food or fresh air! They shut down a whole public housing building and mothers could not even get nappies and milk for their babies. It is really scary to think we in Australia have lost our democracy, out only hope is those brave warriors including some politicians fighting for freedom of health choices.
We the people, have dismissed, cancelled, shut down, terminated the WHO as of our declaration on 30th November 2023. The WHO no longer exists and has no authority to interfere in human health and well-being recommendations, proposals or MANDATES.
JSCOT has shown no interest to date, that I am aware of, in ever acting to responsibly inform the Australian public of the critical nature of the WHO agenda.
OZ senators swear allegiance to the Crown, not the people.
Where the crown stands is very clear.
The PM makes a point of hanging out with Bill Gates.
A few Senators and MPs, are awake or waking up, to the clear actual/potential danger.
However, like with the general public, the "she'll be right mate" attitude tends to prevail down under.
JSCOT says: "all is well, we've got this, nothing to worry about"; the politicians and the public accept this and go on about their business.
Anyone who tries to push awareness risks being labelled a conspiracy theorist.
Most people remain unaware of, or are in denial of, the covid reality.
The danger of the WHO agenda, is therefore not registering on their radar.
Politicians are understandably reluctant to question the conduct of their colleagues in their own arenas, and if they do, generally accept the answers given regardless, for obvious reasons.
Nothing democratic about it - which is why so much needs to change. Our perfectly good system has been hijacked by grifters and those that seek to do us harm. And yes overpaid, soulless bureaucrats with no allegiance to our country, I am looking at you.
Surely most politicians are concerned with their nation's future welfare.
A credible Australian political commentator recently stated, that he knows most politicians and thinks that they are decent people, who think they are acting with integrity and doing a good job to the best of their ability.
This assessment is not at all decisive with respect to overall competence.
The fact that many MPs apparently lack the capacity, to act competently in their roles as responsible representatives, is of great concern to thinking people.
When the Minister for Health can sign correspondence to over 55K Petitioners that is not only incorrect, but hopelessly out of date with no possible explanation other than distain or incompetence there is no integrity or ability. But what can anyone expect from a Government that has used military grade psyops against its own population to assist with mandating a bioweapon? Ignorance or the following of orders is not an excuse - for either of the wings of the one bird that are supposedly our "democratically elected leaders". https://australiaexitsthewho.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Letter-to-MOH-re-Petition-EN5048__Final.pdf
A staffer for a Labor member of JSCOT said of her MP - "she agrees with whatever Labor supports - she sometimes reads the documents and sometimes goes to the Committee meetings - but she is very busy". A Nationals member of JSCOT's explanation on why he had no idea that the Committee he was on had passed the first IHR Amendments was "he was on a lot of Committees". A revamp of the life experience needed to be a Parliamentarian or "Senior Advisor" would be a good start. i.e. ten years experience in any industry outside of Parliament should be a pre-requisite prior to running for a position or calling yourself a "Senior" anything.
Thank you for the input - shocking - but what I had come to suspect.
Agree thoroughly with the last thoughts.
Candidates should perhaps be over 40, have a relevant CV, excellent validated character references, and a significant record of involvement in public service via responsible participation in local government.
None of this political party sponsorship into office of rubber stampers, that can easily be manipulated and controlled, and are willing to become lifelong puppets, once they get a taste for political candy.
On the Canadian Front, the National Citizens' Inquiry has just released its Final Report. This was a volunteer effort led by 4 Commissioners of distinction. The Inquiry went to 8 cities across Canada and logged testimony from both citizens and experts on the response to the pandemic. The NCI Final Report is here - https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/live/
MP Lewis has argued that changes to the IHR will govern the conduct of nations when it comes to responding to public health events and emergencies, such as pandemics. On Sept. 26, she presented,
Petition e-4623 specific to the IHR. The Petition concludes "We, the undersigned, Citizens and Residents of Canada, call upon the House of Commons in Parliament assembled to urgently implement Canada's expeditious withdrawal from the UN and all of its subsidiary organizations, including WHO."
The key passage from the Hansard on this topic by MP Lewis is here -
It is indeed a magic trick, and it has been gradually put in place brick by brick for decades now, with legislation that enables the next step.
Our governments have already shown that they don't care about our national sovereignty, or the interests of country - they have nearly all been bought and bullied into line, to serve the interests of the globalists.
The few lone voices (eg Senator Antic or Malcolm Roberts) all get jeered and dismissed.
Still, we have to try - public outrage does sometimes make a difference, even when it seems to have no effect.
Please help spread the word that the deadline for the Working Group for amendments to the International Health Regulations (WGIHR) to submit a final package of targeted amendments to the WHO is fast approaching - January 27, 2024.
If (and when) the WGIHR fails to meet this deadline it means that NO AMENDMENTS MAY BE CONSIDERED BY the 77th World Health Assembly which is scheduled to begin on May 27, 2024.
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/the-deadline-is-january-27-2024
Well done Libby - Thank you for doing this research. It is much appreciated.
Biosecurity Act 2015
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2017C00303
477 Health Minister may determine emergency requirements during human biosecurity emergency period
(1) During a human biosecurity emergency period, the Health Minister may determine any requirement that he or she is satisfied is necessary:
(a) to prevent or control:
(i) the entry of the declaration listed human disease into Australian territory or a part of Australian territory; or
(ii) the emergence, establishment or spread of the declaration listed human disease in Australian territory or a part of Australian territory; or
(b) to prevent or control the spread of the declaration listed human disease to another country; or
(c) if a recommendation has been made to the Health Minister by the World Health Organization under Part III of the International Health Regulations in relation to the declaration listed human disease—to give effect to the recommendation.
Note 1: A person who fails to comply with a requirement determined under this subsection may commit an offence (see section 479).
Note 2: For variation and revocation, see subsections 33(3) and (3AA) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
(2) A determination made under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument, but section 42 (disallowance) of the Legislation Act 2003 does not apply to the determination.
(3) Without limiting subsection (1), the requirements that the Health Minister may determine include the following:
(a) requirements that apply to persons, goods or conveyances when entering or leaving specified places;
(b) requirements that restrict or prevent the movement of persons, goods or conveyances in or between specified places;
(c) requirements for specified places to be evacuated;
(d) if a recommendation has been made as referred to in paragraph (1)(c)—requirements for the purposes of giving effect to the recommendation.
4) Before determining a requirement under subsection (1), the Health Minister must be satisfied of all of the following:
(a) that the requirement is likely to be effective in, or to contribute to, achieving the purpose for which it is to be determined;
(b) that the requirement is appropriate and adapted to achieve the purpose for which it is to be determined;
(c) that the requirement is no more restrictive or intrusive than is required in the circumstances;
(d) that the manner in which the requirement is to be applied is no more restrictive or intrusive than is required in the circumstances;
(e) that the period during which the requirement is to apply is only as long as is necessary.
(5) A requirement determined under subsection (1) applies despite any provision of any other Australian law.
(6) A determination made under subsection (1) must not require an individual to be subject to a biosecurity measure of a kind set out in Subdivision B of Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 2.
Note: Subdivision B of Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 2 sets out the biosecurity measures that may be included in a human biosecurity control order.
When determination ceases to have effect
(7) A determination made under subsection (1) ceases to have effect at the end of the human biosecurity emergency period, unless it is revoked earlier.
478 Health Minister may give directions during human biosecurity emergency period
(1) During a human biosecurity emergency period, the Health Minister may give any direction, to any person, that the Health Minister is satisfied is necessary:
(a) to prevent or control:
(i) the entry of the declaration listed human disease into Australian territory or a part of Australian territory; or
(ii) the emergence, establishment or spread of the declaration listed human disease in Australian territory or a part of Australian territory; or
(b) to prevent or control the spread of the declaration listed human disease to another country; or
(c) if a recommendation has been made to the Health Minister by the World Health Organization under Part III of the International Health Regulations in relation to the declaration listed human disease—to give effect to the recommendation.
Note 1: A person who fails to comply with a direction given under this subsection may commit an offence (see section 479).
Note 2: See also section 572 (general provisions relating to directions).
(2) Without limiting subsection (1), the directions that the Health Minister may give under that subsection include the following:
(a) a direction to a person who is in a position to close premises, or prevent access to premises, to do so;
(b) a direction for the purposes of giving effect to or enforcing a requirement determined under section 477;
(c) if a recommendation has been made as referred to in paragraph (1)(c)—a direction for the purposes of giving effect to the recommendation.
(3) Before giving a direction under subsection (1), the Health Minister must be satisfied of all of the following:
(a) that the direction is likely to be effective in, or to contribute to, achieving the purpose for which it is to be given;
(b) that the direction is appropriate and adapted to achieve the purpose for which it is to be given;
(c) that the direction is no more restrictive or intrusive than is required in the circumstances;
(d) if the direction is to apply during a period—that the period is only as long as is necessary.
(4) A direction may be given under subsection (1) despite any provision of any other Australian law.
(5) A direction must not be given under subsection (1) to an officer or employee of a State, Territory or State or Territory body unless the direction is in accordance with an agreement between the Commonwealth and the State, Territory or body.
(6) A direction given under subsection (1) must not require an individual to be subject to a biosecurity measure of a kind set out in Subdivision B of Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 2.
Note: Subdivision B of Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 2 sets out the biosecurity measures that may be included in a human biosecurity control order.
When direction ceases to have effect
(7) A direction given under subsection (1) ceases to have effect at the end of the human biosecurity emergency period, unless it is revoked earlier.
479 Person must comply with emergency requirements and directions
(1) A person must comply with a requirement determined under subsection 477(1) that applies to the person.
(2) A person must comply with a direction given under subsection 478(1) that applies to the person.
Fault‑based offences
(3) A person commits an offence if:
(a) a requirement determined under subsection 477(1) applies to the person; and
(b) the person engages in conduct; and
(c) the conduct contravenes the requirement.
Penalty: Imprisonment for 5 years or 300 penalty units, or both.
(4) A person commits an offence if:
(a) a direction given under subsection 478(1) applies to the person; and
(b) the person engages in conduct; and
(c) the conduct contravenes the direction.
Penalty for contravention of this subsection:
Imprisonment for 5 years or 300 penalty units, or both.
Godless unethical sheeple can't have "ethical" government or medicine, it then becomes ALL about Money & Power, with an, "It’s for the good of the people" sham thrown in for good measure!
Libby, nice article.
It seems that we here in the United States 🇺🇸 have also been dealing with the “globalist regime” in our House of Representatives and Senate and through several decades of Presidents.
Although the truth has only just begun to emerge, the so called “Conspiracy Theorists” have been proven correct regarding the United Nations New World Order and their agenda.
It is the duty of each citizen of a country to make their voice heard. Freedom has never been free.
We (The War Room Posse) have been actively engaged with calling and emailing our members of Congress and the Senate for years now and we have made a difference. Our goal is to put our country first!!
I join hands with you and encourage ALL Australian’s to MAKE AUSTRALIA GREAT AGAIN !!
As we join hands to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!! Happy New Year and Much love
Spoiler : Trump will never save anyone other than Trump. Have you not read his book? Listened to what he says?
Putting your faith in a mortal man is foolishness. Building your house on shifting sands.
Thank-you Libby for this accurate update. Australians this is the line in the sand. If you don't want this Gates funded, led by a member of a terrorist organisation/accused of genocide despot in charge, time to let all of our Politicians know. About time the Liberals realised they need to be on the right side of history and this debate if they want another chance to run the country.
I wrote to my Federal MP (Indi, Victoria) as well as all the Victorian Federal coalition Senators regarding this. I believe this is the greatest threat to the greatest number of people in recorded history. We must all urge our politicians to legislate in order to have Australia exit the WHO membership and cut all ties with it before 2025. If this Treaty goes ahead it will be many times worse than the COVID era since there will be far more tools in the tyrannical arsenal than there were three years ago. There will be a Misinformation Act and a Digital ID bill to function in tandem with the Treaty. So the Government will have the power to completely silence your dissent and potentially freeze your bank account should you not consent to medical experiments. Considering the unfathomable step the Government took from 2019 to 2021 (from a world of individual freedoms in 2019 devolving into coercion, forced injections, forced masking, rubber bullets and arrests in 2021), do you really think literally forcing citizens to turn to crime to feed themselves to avoid being a lab rat is a bigger step than that was? It is a much smaller step given that last time you lost your job if you did not submit, so I do not believe I am being paranoid in stating that the Government will potentially cut you off completely from society and incarcerate you in isolation if you do not submit to Tedros's and Bill's will. And even then, they'll experiment on you anyway, just like the Nazis did.
I know what you mean. We need to let the cross benchers know we don't support this https://em.citizengo.org/dc/0LqJl4Fgk6_ebdTLr2iGVS5Y9qTRXOCzcSBg0VOfeTW8YmIeSboNrXC1Y0XveYXmw98_FeGK1WMG0JD8uT_l4azyfPx6XQDdIH6Ed7bWEVPFwPy0F3s7guZjOYqVGuNzTvwNaNk7G92Cu5Wm5yYVyosnlgZmJaUvSOyAGvlVKLlKxSHQDkISVjl1Cv01lRVAJ_Fbg0DjcFuGIsAyL9H4iZB2UFKCkWAgNa3JwhcZVusI6himiKlAgcNDobBpgXdbZsC5GA9u9K70h6MjC-6h3UQoJq9YSqxFJWtXEjWaJgZo0uPszgN6Wkoa0k-2gOVxGdFI6YC7H8gAALtNDFMapg==/OTA3LU9EWS0wNTEAAAGSB5cysdouDG_C2Bf73xLTDlakoAFhdrkw8J1Z41Ov9yvtZ5Btp-tGB0ZMgI4G-ebhk9wM5lk=
Thank you Libby for the research you put into this. You have given us several avenues, including working at state govt level. Have no fear of labels fellow Aussies. Speak truth to power. A label is just name calling, we are adults and those who call us names are children. Speak now and act now or you will not have the chance to change anything in the future. They want us dead or slaves.
Andrew Stephenson is lying the u.k government will sign up to this nonsense without a doubt remember the so called king Charles is head of the wef and was the first evil entity to announce the great reset and the brexit vote was not upheld and a fake leaving agreement was signed which keeps the u.k in it so all smoke and mirrors and bullshit was the outcome
Sorry. Australia has never been sovereign, as it's financial Charter is tended by the British Crown. I can't believe Australian citizens continue to speculate otherwise. The World Health Organization is a corporate financed mafia, period. All members need to be executed.
The plandemic we had was a training session, seeing them lock up healthy people in quarantine stations was enough to scare me. Those who were locked up did not even get healthy food or fresh air! They shut down a whole public housing building and mothers could not even get nappies and milk for their babies. It is really scary to think we in Australia have lost our democracy, out only hope is those brave warriors including some politicians fighting for freedom of health choices.
Amazing Insights from a comprehensive in-depth analysis!! Thanks Libby Klein. You are a Star!!
We the people, have dismissed, cancelled, shut down, terminated the WHO as of our declaration on 30th November 2023. The WHO no longer exists and has no authority to interfere in human health and well-being recommendations, proposals or MANDATES.
The WHO is finished!
We, the people have spoken!
Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to live longer!
TOO MUCH APATHY IN THIS WORLD,,,,,, BUT WHO CARES
JSCOT has shown no interest to date, that I am aware of, in ever acting to responsibly inform the Australian public of the critical nature of the WHO agenda.
OZ senators swear allegiance to the Crown, not the people.
Where the crown stands is very clear.
The PM makes a point of hanging out with Bill Gates.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xi5iEw4ruzo
The foreign minister "provided" $100M to the WHO in September 2023.
The basis and authority for this donation, remain unclear, apart from the usual blather.
https://www.foreignminister.gov.au/minister/penny-wong/media-release/supporting-global-efforts-prevent-prepare-and-respond-pandemics
A few Senators and MPs, are awake or waking up, to the clear actual/potential danger.
However, like with the general public, the "she'll be right mate" attitude tends to prevail down under.
JSCOT says: "all is well, we've got this, nothing to worry about"; the politicians and the public accept this and go on about their business.
Anyone who tries to push awareness risks being labelled a conspiracy theorist.
Most people remain unaware of, or are in denial of, the covid reality.
The danger of the WHO agenda, is therefore not registering on their radar.
Politicians are understandably reluctant to question the conduct of their colleagues in their own arenas, and if they do, generally accept the answers given regardless, for obvious reasons.
All this is called democracy apparently.
Whatever that is.
Nothing democratic about it - which is why so much needs to change. Our perfectly good system has been hijacked by grifters and those that seek to do us harm. And yes overpaid, soulless bureaucrats with no allegiance to our country, I am looking at you.
Some politicians may lack allegiance.
Surely most politicians are concerned with their nation's future welfare.
A credible Australian political commentator recently stated, that he knows most politicians and thinks that they are decent people, who think they are acting with integrity and doing a good job to the best of their ability.
This assessment is not at all decisive with respect to overall competence.
The fact that many MPs apparently lack the capacity, to act competently in their roles as responsible representatives, is of great concern to thinking people.
Something just not adding up here at all.
When the Minister for Health can sign correspondence to over 55K Petitioners that is not only incorrect, but hopelessly out of date with no possible explanation other than distain or incompetence there is no integrity or ability. But what can anyone expect from a Government that has used military grade psyops against its own population to assist with mandating a bioweapon? Ignorance or the following of orders is not an excuse - for either of the wings of the one bird that are supposedly our "democratically elected leaders". https://australiaexitsthewho.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Letter-to-MOH-re-Petition-EN5048__Final.pdf
Yes I noted the response to the petition - alarming.
I would just like to know the individual status of all the MPs on board the ship of state.
Are they all just puppets on strings, who follow orders regardless, and really do not know exactly what they are doing?
If so, then removing the captain and crew will not solve the problem, as it will just recur.
We need some sort of totally new, seaworthy ship of state.
A staffer for a Labor member of JSCOT said of her MP - "she agrees with whatever Labor supports - she sometimes reads the documents and sometimes goes to the Committee meetings - but she is very busy". A Nationals member of JSCOT's explanation on why he had no idea that the Committee he was on had passed the first IHR Amendments was "he was on a lot of Committees". A revamp of the life experience needed to be a Parliamentarian or "Senior Advisor" would be a good start. i.e. ten years experience in any industry outside of Parliament should be a pre-requisite prior to running for a position or calling yourself a "Senior" anything.
Thank you for the input - shocking - but what I had come to suspect.
Agree thoroughly with the last thoughts.
Candidates should perhaps be over 40, have a relevant CV, excellent validated character references, and a significant record of involvement in public service via responsible participation in local government.
None of this political party sponsorship into office of rubber stampers, that can easily be manipulated and controlled, and are willing to become lifelong puppets, once they get a taste for political candy.
On the Canadian Front, the National Citizens' Inquiry has just released its Final Report. This was a volunteer effort led by 4 Commissioners of distinction. The Inquiry went to 8 cities across Canada and logged testimony from both citizens and experts on the response to the pandemic. The NCI Final Report is here - https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/live/
On the Canadian Front, MP Leslyn Lewis is sponsoring Petition e-4623
https://petitions.ourcommons.ca/en/Petition/Details?Petition=e-4623
MP Lewis has argued that changes to the IHR will govern the conduct of nations when it comes to responding to public health events and emergencies, such as pandemics. On Sept. 26, she presented,
Petition e-4623 specific to the IHR. The Petition concludes "We, the undersigned, Citizens and Residents of Canada, call upon the House of Commons in Parliament assembled to urgently implement Canada's expeditious withdrawal from the UN and all of its subsidiary organizations, including WHO."
The key passage from the Hansard on this topic by MP Lewis is here -
https://openparliament.ca/debates/2023/9/26/leslyn-lewis-1/
The full Hansard transcript for this speech dated Sept.26, 2023 is here -
https://www.ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/house/sitting-224/hansard
It is indeed a magic trick, and it has been gradually put in place brick by brick for decades now, with legislation that enables the next step.
Our governments have already shown that they don't care about our national sovereignty, or the interests of country - they have nearly all been bought and bullied into line, to serve the interests of the globalists.
The few lone voices (eg Senator Antic or Malcolm Roberts) all get jeered and dismissed.
Still, we have to try - public outrage does sometimes make a difference, even when it seems to have no effect.
Yes, the Digital ID along with the Misinformation laws and the WHO Treaty make for three ominous siblings.