61 Comments

Fantastic summary! Please contact me directly at your earliest convenience. +1 310-619-3055

Expand full comment

What the WHO says and “dictates” is meaningless until the WHO gets a military of its own to enforce its dictates.

Expand full comment

The missing link is enforceability. What sanctions does the WHO have if a signatory decides to ignore one of its diktats for local reasons? If the WHO can’t enforce anything, then it’s all just words and is optional.

Expand full comment

I would like to translate this into German and share it here if possible.

Expand full comment

The US needs to exit the WHO. Wherever you are on the political spectrum, you must see the totalitarian nightmare they are proposing. Without personal and national sovereignty, we will all be reduced to slaves.

Expand full comment

Correction: From the beginning, it does NOT (or should not) sound sensible. On its face, the goal should sound *un*reasonable to everyone but of course it does not due of decades of indoctrination and propaganda tricking you to think that the scientific method is capable of producing optimized resource allocation to meet demands. That you think the goal sounds "sensible" on its face indicates that you still have some communist ideas deep down that should be expunged. Try some Milton Freidman, Thomas Sowell, Henry Hazlet.

Having different places and peoples try different things is prerequisite for freedom (and science). If we had any such one-world response, we would never have the examples of Sweden and Florida.

Expand full comment

Tedros is not my doctor OR my pharmacist. The WHO was established out of the United Nations to set up and establish guidelines to deal with health issues at that time. (1948) Our own Eleanor Roosevelt chaired the committee for the creation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which incorporates many of the rights in our own Constitution of the United States of America. The proposed WHO treaty not only violates rights guaranteed by our Constitution, it violates many of the rights established by the United Nations. If they want to break their own rules, that's up to them. (UN) Do they really expect the world population to submit to such Draconian measures? It proves the insanity of the psychopaths directing the WHO and the UN. We don't need them. We should withdraw our membership in both organizations. What are they going to do to us? Bomb us? That certainly isn't 'healthy'!

Expand full comment

Thank you James for everything you're doing. I want nothing to do with any of this. Under dignity and human rights I am not allowing a so-called elected body to make decisions that by me legally anything. One I didn't vote for anything. To it's my body it's my life . I don't want my medical records and my business of financial exchange being global or even public. it's my business not theirs. This violates everything in our Bill of Rights it violates the first second third fourth amendment, there's so much you could just go on and on. This was a well written well understandable peace. thank you

Expand full comment

A ridiculous attempt by the WHO to lay down rules of war under the guise of health care. Why would any country agree to this?

Expand full comment

They have one. The UN.

Expand full comment

DOUBLE-YOU'S

* *

EXCELLENT PIECE,

Libby Klein !

Thank You, Very Much,

From, All of US.

**

"It's not what we would choose (choose, choose) to do"

~ Waters & Wright

Expand full comment

Are these rewrites Constitutionally enforceable without a vote by Congress?

Expand full comment

Thanks a lot for this overview. During the swine flu and covid, which so far has killed 08% of the world's population, the WHO has not demonstrated good recommendations, leadership or stewardship of health decisions. There's not much reason to assume any different, since they are funded by pharmaceutical interests. Pharmaceutical interests have bought many Western governments as well, so I hope non-western governments help the world fight this. The world is too big and people are too different to have centralized control over health, it's ridiculous really. Individual people control their health and their body, and make their own health decisions through informed consent. The WHOs creepy control-mongering over people's bodies is creepy.

Expand full comment

Yesterday I said, I'd like to translate this and spread it in Germany. Today I already found it on the platform I thought of - uncutnews.ch - well Thank you for the good work!!!

Expand full comment

And none care to reveal to their constituents this laid out plan who in the US alone, 182 mayors have agreed to (all blue areas). That is not including the mayors all over the world as can be seen in the database document below. Put the country of interest in and all the cities involved will appear! They apparently don’t want to tell US in advance about their plans. Here are a few they mention but begs the question what else have they planned are not mentioning here??

only 3 new pieces of clothing a year

Far less consumption of meat

70% less cars by 2030

15 minute cities you can’t leave

Mayors c40 list climate change https://www.globalcovenantofmayors.org

https://www.c40.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/2270_C40_CBE_MainReport_250719.original.pdf

Expand full comment