3 Comments

So, the JSCOT Committee waved through the Article 59 Amendments shortening the timeframes for Amendments to take effect. If the IHR Amendments are approved at the WHA in May, despite ignoring the WHO's own constitution, how on earth does JSCOT expect to examine the effects of the over 300, so far not publicly available IHR Amendments, including their effect on our domestic legislation, our constitution and human rights laws, conduct public consultation & report to the Govt allowing them time to make a final decision within 10 months - while also doing the same on the full Pandemic Treaty / venture capital document cementing "One Health" aka giving control of the biosphere to The WHO? Would love to see a timeline on this.

Shame none of them even considered the petition signed by 55,563 people alerting them to the perils of rubber stamping the first set of Amendments. But do they even care? They are looking for a cop out already. We must hold them & the Government responsible for this and all other disasters stemming from Agenda 2030 & the wholesale destruction of our once lucky country.

Expand full comment

"Australia’s sovereign right to decide its domestic health policies" ... Yeah right.

What 'Australian' bureaucrats, police, politicians did to the populace in 2020 - 2023 is in perfect concert with the aspirations of the WHO. Australian WEF/WHO political adherents acted in tacit concordance with the hypnotising psy-op program implemented on the populace, who, sadly as a whole marched in perfect lockstep. The assault by over-paid medical jabsters continues apace.

It will be interesting to observe just who is left standing as the war against humanity unfolds.

Expand full comment

Do you know what the equivalent review of this is in Australia? https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2787947

Expand full comment