Libby, we didn't give them this power...they took it.
They betrayed our trust. They exploited us. These traitors have destroyed the psyche of this country, it will never be the same.
They stole freedom, and set Australians against each other with this phony manufactured crisis.
Take for example National Cabinet - Scott Morrison and the Premiers and Chief Ministers set the ball rolling on mandatory vaccination, they broke the principle of voluntary informed consent for Covid vaccination, with the collaboration of Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly and the AHPPC.
On 4 June 2021 the AHPPC specifically announced the "AHPPC does not recommend compulsory COVID-19 vaccination requirements for aged care workers".
Also on the same day, 4 June 2021, an ABC headline announced: "Scott Morrison to use National Cabinet to lobby state governments to go against health advice on COVID vaccination".
The ABC reported: "The Prime Minister will lobby state and territory leaders to overrule medical experts' advice and force aged care workers to get the coronavirus vaccine... The panel of health experts, chaired by the Chief Medical Officer, has advised for a second time against making the coronavirus vaccine compulsory."
The workers' union did not support compulsion, with the ABC reporting: "A union representing Victoria's aged care workforce, the Health Workers Union (HWU), has argued against the decision of the Prime Minister... Union state secretary Diana Asmar said the HWU had strongly encouraged workers to get the jab but did not believe it should be compulsory." Ms Asmar said: "We live in a free country and not Communist China."
It's stunning that it was publicly announced that Scott Morrison, a politician, was going to lobby his state and territory counterparts in National Cabinet to overrule the medical experts' advice.
As reported by the national broadcaster, the ABC, the political plan was to 'force' aged care workers to have the coronavirus vaccine, thereby denying this group of Australians the freedom to consent to or refuse medical interventions depending upon their own personal health circumstances and preferences, and threatening them with the loss of livelihood for refusing to comply with vaccination mandates.
Subsequently, on 28 June 2021, it was announced "The National Cabinet agreed that COVID-19 vaccinations are to be mandated for residential aged care workers as a condition of working in an aged care facility through shared state, territory and Commonwealth authorities and compliance measures."
So after pressure from Scott Morrison and National Cabinet, Paul Kelly and the AHPPC reneged on their earlier advice against making the coronavirus vaccine compulsory for aged care workers, and rubber-stamped a political decision after the event, as announced in the AHPPC statement, a day later on 29 June 2021: "AHPPC recommends to National Cabinet that the residential aged care workforce be vaccinated against COVID-19, as a condition of working in a residential aged care facility..."
The Australian Nursing & Midwifery Federation called it out at the time, being "concerned that mandating vaccinations for the aged care workforce could be a 'political decision, not a health decision’…”
Paul Kelly subsequently boasted "Australia was one of the first countries internationally to mandate COVID-19 vaccination", in his co-authored article published in the Medical Journal of Australia in November 2022 - Implementing mandatory COVID-19 vaccination for Australian aged care workers.
In other words, Australia was one of the first countries in the world to deny voluntary informed consent for the Covid vaccinations, facilitated by medical practitioner Paul Kelly and his medical colleagues on the AHPPC.
Australians were press-ganged into participating in a massive global scientific experiment, with then Health Minister Greg Hunt admitting in February 2021: "The world is engaged in the largest clinical trial, the largest global vaccination trial ever..."
But this was an experiment without voluntary informed consent, which is a violation of medical ethics and international human rights conventions such as the Helsinki Declaration.
Paul Kelly and the AHPPC should not have recommended mandatory Covid injections for any group in Australia, and the medical profession should not have collaborated with mandated medical interventions.
The denial of voluntary informed consent for residential aged care workers set a precedent for depriving others of voluntary informed consent for Covid-19 vaccination, including subsequent workforce mandates recommended by Paul Kelly and the AHPPC, i.e. mandatory vaccination of all workers in health care settings; mandating vaccination for disability support workers; and mandatory vaccination of aged care in-home and community aged care workers.
In regard to 'bad guys', we need to closely examine the net...
And former Health Minister Greg Hunt is a very big fish.
Hunt was basically calling the shots during the bulk of the Covid scam, along with Paul Kelly the Chief Medical Officer, and the Governor General...and Scott Morrison and National Cabinet.
I wrote to Greg Hunt on 23 July 2021 asking "what is the definition of 'the emergency' you are using to justify the Governor General's declaration of a human biosecurity emergency under the Biosecurity Act 2015?"
I did not receive a response.
I also asked: "What is the "specialist medical and epidemiological advice provided by the Australian Health Protection Principal Committee (AHPPC) and the Commonwealth Chief Medical Officer"? Has this been objectively and independently assessed? Please provide me with the AHPPC and Commonwealth Chief Medical Officer's advice, and the empirical evidence supporting this advice."
No response.
I also asked: Who are the members of the AHPPC? The AHPPC webpage states: "AHPPC is comprised of all state and territory Chief Health Officers and is chaired by the Australian Chief Medical Officer."[4] This is surprisingly scant information for a group of unelected people who are wielding enormous influence over the free movement and association of Australians during this extensive 'emergency' period, and who are also pressing covid-19 vaccine products upon the Australian population."
No response.
It's also very interesting to note that before entering the Australian Parliament in 2001, Greg Hunt was the Director of Global Strategy of the World Economic Forum 2000-2001 - responsible for the development of global strategy for the WEF, working directly to the CEO, and during 1999-2001 he was Engagement Manager - McKinsey & Co, providing specialist advice in telecommunication, start-ups, government reform and the banking sector.
So just as Klaus Schwab has boasted...zee cabinets were penetrated...after which we ended up with a fake pandemic to install totalitarianism.
I would suggest that most probably Australia to a limited extent in both NSW and Victoria, followed the lead of the USA and Britain in murdering the vulnerable to make the common cold look more dangerous than is actually was. The British murdered of multiple thousands of their old and vulnerable in care homes with Midazilam and Morphine while US used the deadly drug Remdesivir.
None the less, my fear come more from the number of people the have a particularly unhealthy trust in government, and more so their social programming that makes them follow the herd in compliance with rules that blatantly go against the well being of themselves and the population as a whole.
Genocide is an easy option for Criminals placed in power by Billionaire Crime Families, only when they have a population that is largely willing to go along with it, rather than risk standing out in the crowd (in essence "Sheep").
I recognise that standing out is statistically more dangerous than seeing the real danger, but hiding out in the crowd, and that honour can easily be miss represented as arrogance, but frankly those that judge poorly the appearance of pride or arrogance without taking into account conduct, are in essence weasels in sheep's clothing.
Everybody always had the individual option to stay home under the bed, wear a face rag, and jab themselves with whatever slop they wanted... the mandates were fascism for the sake of the most gullible and gutless in society. I don’t despise (most) individual Australians, but I do despise the collective. The brave, selfless and principled lost their jobs, the gullible and the gutless kept their jobs. Police, health workers, teachers: only the gullible and gutless remain.
The creation of the UN and WHO by the Eugenicist crime families such as the Rockefellers who were behind the Nazi eugenics and throughout WWII sold the Nazis with essential fuel additive to enable there war machine, should be more than enough to inform any rational society that these creatures are a threat that should have been entirely eliminated more than half a century ago.
Instead the genocidal Khazarian Mafia who claim their families to go right back to the tyrant Nimrod, have used their murderous criminality to defrauded humanity of its birthright and now control the powerful Western Block and own our systems of governance lock, stock and Barrel.
No rational look at the entirely corrupt Howard government would fail to show that they were the terrorists that murdered 35 people at Port Arthur and disarmed not only the people of their fire arms, but also the regulators that stood by and did nothing about the extreme corruption that continues to this day.
The murder last year of three somewhat reckless people in Far North Queensland by police was a blatant warning that "resistance is futile, you will comply or die".The evidence however, that compliance will bring a far more excruciating and soul destroying death, should not be lost on any wakeful individuals. In particular the gunning down of the young woman in her kitchen can be seen as an intentionally tyrannical sociopathic message that resistance will bring death not only to you but your loved ones, or indeed as the tyranny takes on momentum, whole communities will be ruthlessly targeted by the psychopathic regimes installed by the Billionaire Parasite Caste.
Back in the mid 70s as a young man I joined the the military and studied marshal arts. It was soon apparent that the military is for the most part incompetent and learning anything useful in the armed forces, would mean being thrust into the company of the typical low life mercenary types I have always detested. I still do believe that learning marshal arts is an important skill/mind set to defend yourself and more importantly the values of a safe and wholesome society.
It would send a useful message if thousands of people with good intention join gun clubs and marshal arts clubs, practicing these skills burn them into your mind and nervous system. Literally those slow motion scenes from "Kung Fu" movies, is how, in a fight, people appear to move to those who train their nervous system ti react automatically to real life stimulus.
158. Enforcement of requirement to undergo medical observation, medical examination
(1) If an authorised officer gives a direction to a person under section 157(1)(j) to undergo medical observation, medical examination or medical treatment or to be vaccinated, an authorised officer or police officer may use reasonable force to ensure that the direction is complied with, including, if necessary —
(a) to apprehend and detain the person to whom the direction applies (the relevant person) and take the relevant person to a place where the person is required to undergo medical observation, medical examination or medical treatment or to be vaccinated in accordance with the direction; and
(b) to detain the relevant person at the place where he or she is required to undergo medical observation, medical examination or medical treatment or to be vaccinated in accordance with the direction; and
(c) to restrain the relevant person —
(i) to enable a medical observation, medical examination or medical treatment to be carried out; or
(ii) to enable the relevant person to be vaccinated;
and
(d) to remove anything (including underwear) that the relevant person is wearing, if —
(i) the removal of the thing is reasonably necessary to enable a medical examination or medical treatment to be carried out or, as the case requires, to enable the person to be vaccinated; and
(ii) the relevant person is given a reasonable opportunity to remove the thing himself or herself, and refuses or fails to do so.
(2) A direction under section 157(1)(j) to undergo medical examination or medical treatment or to be vaccinated authorises —
(a) in the case of a direction to undergo medical examination —
(i) the carrying out of that medical examination in accordance with the direction; and
(ii) the testing of any sample obtained or taken in connection with that medical examination;
and
(b) in the case of a direction to undergo medical treatment —
(i) the giving of medical treatment to the relevant person in accordance with the direction; and
(ii) the testing of any sample obtained or taken in connection with that medical treatment;
and
(c) in the case of a direction to be vaccinated, the vaccination of the relevant person.
(3) If any action taken under subsection (1) involves the removal of an item of clothing —
(a) it must be done with decency and sensitivity and in a manner that gives to the relevant person the degree of privacy and dignity that is consistent with ensuring compliance with the direction; and
(b) the authorised officer or police officer taking the action and any other person present while it is done (excluding any person who is carrying out any medical examination or medical treatment or vaccinating the relevant person) must, if practicable, be of the same gender as the relevant person; and
(c) the number of people present while it is done (excluding a person who is present under paragraph (d)) must be no more than is reasonably necessary to ensure that the direction is complied with effectively and to ensure the safety of all present; and
(d) if the relevant person is a child or an impaired person, it must, if practicable, be done in the presence of a responsible person or some other person who can provide the child or impaired person with support and represent his or her interests.
The Australian Immunisation Handbook, under Valid consent states:
"For consent to be legally valid, the following elements must be present...It must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation...It can only be given after the potential risks and benefits of the relevant vaccine, the risks of not having it, and any alternative options have been explained to the person."
What is the position of a practitioner who proceeds to vaccinate a person they know has been forced to submit to the medical intervention under "158. Enforcement of requirement to undergo medical observation, medical examination"
Is the Public Health Act 2016 in Western Australia legitimate in forcing vaccination? Who specifically came up with this Act? Actual names. Why did they do this? On what authority?
Great question..I am sure that the majority of GP`s would do it since many appear to think that Vaccination carries zero risk and that only the uneducated would be against this amazing technology...
Proof that the majority of doctors are either 1) idiot savants 2) criminally negligent in practicing their profession 3) callous with no regard for those they harm or 4) a combination of any of the above.
This legislation is an unlawful crime against humanity that can only be rationally seen as a treasonous tool of oppression. It is an Act of War against wholesome civil society where it's is all adults personal responsibility and duty to use absolutely any force to prevent the crime from taking place.
I goes entirely against the Nuremberg Code and therefore each and every individual that had a part in its creation and passing through parliament is a criminal that should spent the rest of their infestation of this earth, locked in a small dark prison cell
Libby, we didn't give them this power...they took it.
They betrayed our trust. They exploited us. These traitors have destroyed the psyche of this country, it will never be the same.
They stole freedom, and set Australians against each other with this phony manufactured crisis.
Take for example National Cabinet - Scott Morrison and the Premiers and Chief Ministers set the ball rolling on mandatory vaccination, they broke the principle of voluntary informed consent for Covid vaccination, with the collaboration of Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly and the AHPPC.
On 4 June 2021 the AHPPC specifically announced the "AHPPC does not recommend compulsory COVID-19 vaccination requirements for aged care workers".
Also on the same day, 4 June 2021, an ABC headline announced: "Scott Morrison to use National Cabinet to lobby state governments to go against health advice on COVID vaccination".
The ABC reported: "The Prime Minister will lobby state and territory leaders to overrule medical experts' advice and force aged care workers to get the coronavirus vaccine... The panel of health experts, chaired by the Chief Medical Officer, has advised for a second time against making the coronavirus vaccine compulsory."
The workers' union did not support compulsion, with the ABC reporting: "A union representing Victoria's aged care workforce, the Health Workers Union (HWU), has argued against the decision of the Prime Minister... Union state secretary Diana Asmar said the HWU had strongly encouraged workers to get the jab but did not believe it should be compulsory." Ms Asmar said: "We live in a free country and not Communist China."
It's stunning that it was publicly announced that Scott Morrison, a politician, was going to lobby his state and territory counterparts in National Cabinet to overrule the medical experts' advice.
As reported by the national broadcaster, the ABC, the political plan was to 'force' aged care workers to have the coronavirus vaccine, thereby denying this group of Australians the freedom to consent to or refuse medical interventions depending upon their own personal health circumstances and preferences, and threatening them with the loss of livelihood for refusing to comply with vaccination mandates.
Subsequently, on 28 June 2021, it was announced "The National Cabinet agreed that COVID-19 vaccinations are to be mandated for residential aged care workers as a condition of working in an aged care facility through shared state, territory and Commonwealth authorities and compliance measures."
So after pressure from Scott Morrison and National Cabinet, Paul Kelly and the AHPPC reneged on their earlier advice against making the coronavirus vaccine compulsory for aged care workers, and rubber-stamped a political decision after the event, as announced in the AHPPC statement, a day later on 29 June 2021: "AHPPC recommends to National Cabinet that the residential aged care workforce be vaccinated against COVID-19, as a condition of working in a residential aged care facility..."
The Australian Nursing & Midwifery Federation called it out at the time, being "concerned that mandating vaccinations for the aged care workforce could be a 'political decision, not a health decision’…”
Paul Kelly subsequently boasted "Australia was one of the first countries internationally to mandate COVID-19 vaccination", in his co-authored article published in the Medical Journal of Australia in November 2022 - Implementing mandatory COVID-19 vaccination for Australian aged care workers.
In other words, Australia was one of the first countries in the world to deny voluntary informed consent for the Covid vaccinations, facilitated by medical practitioner Paul Kelly and his medical colleagues on the AHPPC.
Australians were press-ganged into participating in a massive global scientific experiment, with then Health Minister Greg Hunt admitting in February 2021: "The world is engaged in the largest clinical trial, the largest global vaccination trial ever..."
But this was an experiment without voluntary informed consent, which is a violation of medical ethics and international human rights conventions such as the Helsinki Declaration.
Paul Kelly and the AHPPC should not have recommended mandatory Covid injections for any group in Australia, and the medical profession should not have collaborated with mandated medical interventions.
The denial of voluntary informed consent for residential aged care workers set a precedent for depriving others of voluntary informed consent for Covid-19 vaccination, including subsequent workforce mandates recommended by Paul Kelly and the AHPPC, i.e. mandatory vaccination of all workers in health care settings; mandating vaccination for disability support workers; and mandatory vaccination of aged care in-home and community aged care workers.
For references supporting commentary above, please see my notification to AHPRA about CMO Paul Kelly, 16 June 2023: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2023/06/notification-to-ahpra-re-medical-practitioner-paul-kelly.pdf
In regard to 'bad guys', we need to closely examine the net...
And former Health Minister Greg Hunt is a very big fish.
Hunt was basically calling the shots during the bulk of the Covid scam, along with Paul Kelly the Chief Medical Officer, and the Governor General...and Scott Morrison and National Cabinet.
I wrote to Greg Hunt on 23 July 2021 asking "what is the definition of 'the emergency' you are using to justify the Governor General's declaration of a human biosecurity emergency under the Biosecurity Act 2015?"
I did not receive a response.
I also asked: "What is the "specialist medical and epidemiological advice provided by the Australian Health Protection Principal Committee (AHPPC) and the Commonwealth Chief Medical Officer"? Has this been objectively and independently assessed? Please provide me with the AHPPC and Commonwealth Chief Medical Officer's advice, and the empirical evidence supporting this advice."
No response.
I also asked: Who are the members of the AHPPC? The AHPPC webpage states: "AHPPC is comprised of all state and territory Chief Health Officers and is chaired by the Australian Chief Medical Officer."[4] This is surprisingly scant information for a group of unelected people who are wielding enormous influence over the free movement and association of Australians during this extensive 'emergency' period, and who are also pressing covid-19 vaccine products upon the Australian population."
No response.
It's also very interesting to note that before entering the Australian Parliament in 2001, Greg Hunt was the Director of Global Strategy of the World Economic Forum 2000-2001 - responsible for the development of global strategy for the WEF, working directly to the CEO, and during 1999-2001 he was Engagement Manager - McKinsey & Co, providing specialist advice in telecommunication, start-ups, government reform and the banking sector.
So just as Klaus Schwab has boasted...zee cabinets were penetrated...after which we ended up with a fake pandemic to install totalitarianism.
So much to look back on now...
Also see my substack article: “THEY FAKED A PANDEMIC TO INSTALL TOTALITARIANISM.” https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/they-faked-a-pandemic-to-install
I would suggest that most probably Australia to a limited extent in both NSW and Victoria, followed the lead of the USA and Britain in murdering the vulnerable to make the common cold look more dangerous than is actually was. The British murdered of multiple thousands of their old and vulnerable in care homes with Midazilam and Morphine while US used the deadly drug Remdesivir.
None the less, my fear come more from the number of people the have a particularly unhealthy trust in government, and more so their social programming that makes them follow the herd in compliance with rules that blatantly go against the well being of themselves and the population as a whole.
Genocide is an easy option for Criminals placed in power by Billionaire Crime Families, only when they have a population that is largely willing to go along with it, rather than risk standing out in the crowd (in essence "Sheep").
I recognise that standing out is statistically more dangerous than seeing the real danger, but hiding out in the crowd, and that honour can easily be miss represented as arrogance, but frankly those that judge poorly the appearance of pride or arrogance without taking into account conduct, are in essence weasels in sheep's clothing.
ITS TIME TO FIGHT BACK IN ALL NONVIOLENT WAYS UNTIL THATS USED UP NEVER GIVE UP UNITE WITH GOD AND LIKE MINDED WARIORS AGAINST ALL MURDEROUS EVILS
Everybody always had the individual option to stay home under the bed, wear a face rag, and jab themselves with whatever slop they wanted... the mandates were fascism for the sake of the most gullible and gutless in society. I don’t despise (most) individual Australians, but I do despise the collective. The brave, selfless and principled lost their jobs, the gullible and the gutless kept their jobs. Police, health workers, teachers: only the gullible and gutless remain.
Incorrect use of the term fascism. Italy and Germany were up against the Globalists of their day.
The creation of the UN and WHO by the Eugenicist crime families such as the Rockefellers who were behind the Nazi eugenics and throughout WWII sold the Nazis with essential fuel additive to enable there war machine, should be more than enough to inform any rational society that these creatures are a threat that should have been entirely eliminated more than half a century ago.
Instead the genocidal Khazarian Mafia who claim their families to go right back to the tyrant Nimrod, have used their murderous criminality to defrauded humanity of its birthright and now control the powerful Western Block and own our systems of governance lock, stock and Barrel.
No rational look at the entirely corrupt Howard government would fail to show that they were the terrorists that murdered 35 people at Port Arthur and disarmed not only the people of their fire arms, but also the regulators that stood by and did nothing about the extreme corruption that continues to this day.
The murder last year of three somewhat reckless people in Far North Queensland by police was a blatant warning that "resistance is futile, you will comply or die".The evidence however, that compliance will bring a far more excruciating and soul destroying death, should not be lost on any wakeful individuals. In particular the gunning down of the young woman in her kitchen can be seen as an intentionally tyrannical sociopathic message that resistance will bring death not only to you but your loved ones, or indeed as the tyranny takes on momentum, whole communities will be ruthlessly targeted by the psychopathic regimes installed by the Billionaire Parasite Caste.
Back in the mid 70s as a young man I joined the the military and studied marshal arts. It was soon apparent that the military is for the most part incompetent and learning anything useful in the armed forces, would mean being thrust into the company of the typical low life mercenary types I have always detested. I still do believe that learning marshal arts is an important skill/mind set to defend yourself and more importantly the values of a safe and wholesome society.
It would send a useful message if thousands of people with good intention join gun clubs and marshal arts clubs, practicing these skills burn them into your mind and nervous system. Literally those slow motion scenes from "Kung Fu" movies, is how, in a fight, people appear to move to those who train their nervous system ti react automatically to real life stimulus.
"Like the Public Health Act 2016 in Western Australia which legalises forced vaccination. "
Exactly where does it say that inside the legislation?
158. Enforcement of requirement to undergo medical observation, medical examination
(1) If an authorised officer gives a direction to a person under section 157(1)(j) to undergo medical observation, medical examination or medical treatment or to be vaccinated, an authorised officer or police officer may use reasonable force to ensure that the direction is complied with, including, if necessary —
(a) to apprehend and detain the person to whom the direction applies (the relevant person) and take the relevant person to a place where the person is required to undergo medical observation, medical examination or medical treatment or to be vaccinated in accordance with the direction; and
(b) to detain the relevant person at the place where he or she is required to undergo medical observation, medical examination or medical treatment or to be vaccinated in accordance with the direction; and
(c) to restrain the relevant person —
(i) to enable a medical observation, medical examination or medical treatment to be carried out; or
(ii) to enable the relevant person to be vaccinated;
and
(d) to remove anything (including underwear) that the relevant person is wearing, if —
(i) the removal of the thing is reasonably necessary to enable a medical examination or medical treatment to be carried out or, as the case requires, to enable the person to be vaccinated; and
(ii) the relevant person is given a reasonable opportunity to remove the thing himself or herself, and refuses or fails to do so.
(2) A direction under section 157(1)(j) to undergo medical examination or medical treatment or to be vaccinated authorises —
(a) in the case of a direction to undergo medical examination —
(i) the carrying out of that medical examination in accordance with the direction; and
(ii) the testing of any sample obtained or taken in connection with that medical examination;
and
(b) in the case of a direction to undergo medical treatment —
(i) the giving of medical treatment to the relevant person in accordance with the direction; and
(ii) the testing of any sample obtained or taken in connection with that medical treatment;
and
(c) in the case of a direction to be vaccinated, the vaccination of the relevant person.
(3) If any action taken under subsection (1) involves the removal of an item of clothing —
(a) it must be done with decency and sensitivity and in a manner that gives to the relevant person the degree of privacy and dignity that is consistent with ensuring compliance with the direction; and
(b) the authorised officer or police officer taking the action and any other person present while it is done (excluding any person who is carrying out any medical examination or medical treatment or vaccinating the relevant person) must, if practicable, be of the same gender as the relevant person; and
(c) the number of people present while it is done (excluding a person who is present under paragraph (d)) must be no more than is reasonably necessary to ensure that the direction is complied with effectively and to ensure the safety of all present; and
(d) if the relevant person is a child or an impaired person, it must, if practicable, be done in the presence of a responsible person or some other person who can provide the child or impaired person with support and represent his or her interests.
(4) This section does not limit section 161.
Thanks..!!
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/wa/consol_act/pha2016126/s158.html
I was assuming you were wrong(because of how insidious this is)..when in fact..I was wrong in believing this could never happen in Australia.
Shame on Australia..
Imagine if journalists found out.../sarcasm
Looking at the example of enforced vaccination...
The Australian Immunisation Handbook, under Valid consent states:
"For consent to be legally valid, the following elements must be present...It must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation...It can only be given after the potential risks and benefits of the relevant vaccine, the risks of not having it, and any alternative options have been explained to the person."
What is the position of a practitioner who proceeds to vaccinate a person they know has been forced to submit to the medical intervention under "158. Enforcement of requirement to undergo medical observation, medical examination"
Is the Public Health Act 2016 in Western Australia legitimate in forcing vaccination? Who specifically came up with this Act? Actual names. Why did they do this? On what authority?
Clearly on the entirely fraudulent authority demons, those that holds human form, but iare undoubtedly less than human.
Great question..I am sure that the majority of GP`s would do it since many appear to think that Vaccination carries zero risk and that only the uneducated would be against this amazing technology...
Proof that the majority of doctors are either 1) idiot savants 2) criminally negligent in practicing their profession 3) callous with no regard for those they harm or 4) a combination of any of the above.
This legislation is an unlawful crime against humanity that can only be rationally seen as a treasonous tool of oppression. It is an Act of War against wholesome civil society where it's is all adults personal responsibility and duty to use absolutely any force to prevent the crime from taking place.
I goes entirely against the Nuremberg Code and therefore each and every individual that had a part in its creation and passing through parliament is a criminal that should spent the rest of their infestation of this earth, locked in a small dark prison cell
I would add to “ idiot savants” as without any savant like qualities.